Re: Sockets question

[Brian@xxxxxxxxxx]

   >Yes, I understand your situation.  I've also understood it the other
   >99999999999999999999999999999999999999 times that people have asked
   me
   >the exact same thing.  Do you really believe that you're the only one
   on
   >the planet who's ever asked this question or had this problem?
   >You're missing several things:
   >a) The nbrecv() procedure is intended to be used on a NON-BLOCKING
   >socket.  Therefore it'll never, ever, ever, get hung up on the recv()
   call.
   >The "nb" at the start of the procedure call stands for
   "non-blocking".
   >It's intended that you create your socket by calling the nbsocket()
   >procedure in the same service program, which will put the socket into
   >non-blocking mode for you.  READ THE ARTICLE.
   >b) The nbrecv() procedure was one of two alternatives that are
   discussed
   >in that article.  If you don't like it -- use the other alternative.
   Ouch!
   Sorry for being so thick headed.  The concepts have finally sunk in
   and I have a working program.
   Thank you for your time.
   Brian J. Garland
   Vermont Information Processing, Inc.
   brian@xxxxxxxxxx

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the FTPAPI mailing list.  To unsubscribe, please go to:
http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
-----------------------------------------------------------------------