Re: [Ftpapi] Using http_url_post_stmf - very slow

[Scott Klement <sk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Lorne,

There's not much information, here.  "It's slow" is very hard for me to 
troubleshoot when it's not slow for me...

I don't think there's a "preferred approach" -- it's whatever works best 
for you.  For sure, sending data from memory will be faster since 
there's no disk access involved -- but in most cases, this difference 
won't be noticed since network speed tends to be slower than disk speed 
-- but maybe it's different in your case?

-SK


On 6/8/2017 3:49 PM, Sturgeoff, Lorne wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> I have a program that uses http_url_post_stmf to send an encoded 
> stream file to a web service (https:// etc), based on EXAMPLE7 in 
> LIBHTTP/QRPGLESRC.
>
> When we upload files to the same web service using PC tools they go in 
> seconds. When they go with HTTPAPI using http_url_post_stmf, they go 
> very slowly indeed. I have the job running at priority 19 and the 
> system is not burdened at all (Power 7 running IBM i 7.2).
>
> Is this the preferred approach to send stream files to a web service 
> or should I be using a different api?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lorne.

--
_______________________________________________
Ftpapi mailing list
Ftpapi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi