Re: XML-SAX opcodes vs. WSDL2RPG

[Alan Campin <alan0307d@xxxxxxxxx>]

Do you need XML-SAX? Since you are sending out via HTTPAPI, can't you
just use the EXPAT support built in? The XML-SAX works fine once you
figure out the tricks. EXPAT works fine. I have never used WSDL2RPG so
can't comment there. Have used EXPAT extensively and never had a
problem. Have used XML-SAX for tests and it works fine but in very
different way. I have also used plain old XML-INTO. The only support
by IBM is going to the IBM stuff but that does not seem like a good
criteria for using a product.

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Carter Engelhart <EngelhCS@xxxxxx> wrote:
>    We are at a decision point between using XML-SAX opcodes vs. WSDL2RPG
>    We have been unable to locate any credible reviews on which one is
>    better to use.
>    In our case we will be sending out a simple request from our iSeries
>    system via you httpapi product to an IBM P-Series server within our
>    fire wall to IBM's Intiate product and taking in an XML response that
>    we will need to break apart push to a DDS defined Physical File.
>    Our considerations for the decision are:
>    * Will it make the process easy to code>
>    * Will it make the process easy to debug?
>    * Is the product proven/reliable?
>    * Is the product supported by IBM?
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is the FTPAPI mailing list.  To unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the FTPAPI mailing list.  To unsubscribe, please go to:
http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
-----------------------------------------------------------------------