Re: SIGNAL_H

[Scott Klement <sk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for letting me know.  I will update my copy.

I don't think the average joe will know the difference between having a 
process that is or isn't enabled for signals...  that's why nobody has 
noticed this before.

On 8/18/2011 3:42 PM, ksherbert@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>     I just happened to be looking in the SIGNAL_H /copy and I noticed that
>     the definition was wrong for Qp0sDisableSignals.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the FTPAPI mailing list.  To unsubscribe, please go to:
http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
-----------------------------------------------------------------------