Re: HTTPAPI Only SOAP 1.1 or SOAP 1.2 messages are supported in the system

[Scott Klement <sk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, that looks right to me.

Never heard of http://www.w3.org/2005/08/soap/envelope/, but that may be 
part of the SOAP addressing standard.  If it matches his WSDL (i.e. he 
used a tool like SoapUI to generate his SOAP message) then it might be 
correct.

I actually thought that Rags Rags (the original poster of this thread) 
had solved his problem back in April.



On 5/4/2011 2:17 AM, ronnie wrote:
> Hi Charles/Scott.
>
> See, I told you I was a newbie. :)
> Correct me if I am wrong again.
> In other words in his original message he is using http://www.w3.org/2005/08/soap/envelope/ as the soap-env
> And he should be using
> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ for soap 1.1
> or
> http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope for soap 1.2
>
> Irrespective of which soap tag he uses.
>
> Thanks
> Ronnie
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ftpapi-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ftpapi-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klement
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:19 AM
> To: HTTPAPI and FTPAPI Projects
> Subject: Re: HTTPAPI Only SOAP 1.1 or SOAP 1.2 messages are supported in the system
>
> Hi Ronnie,
>
> Bear in mind that the namespace prefix (SOAP vs SOAP12 in your example)
> doesn't mean much by itself.  It also has to point to the proper URI for
> SOAP 1.1 or 1.2
>
> The following three XML tags are exactly equivalent:
>
> <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope";>
>
> <SOAP12:Envelope xmlns:SOAP12="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope";>
>
> <BobsYourUncle:Envelope
> xmlns:BobsYourUncle="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope";>
>
> The part that matters is NOT the "SOAP" or "SOAP12" or "BobsYourUncle".
> The part that matters is the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope.
> The SOAP, SOAP12, and BobsYourUncle in the preceding examples are all
> placeholders for the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope URI.  Since
> they all point to the same URI, they are equivalent.
>
> In fact, if I deliberately wanted to be confusing, I could do this:
>
> <SOAP12:Envelope xmlns:SOAP12="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
>
> Notice the URI is the URI for SOAP 1.1.  The preceding example is
> actually SOAP 1.1 (Despite the name 'SOAP12')  Likewise, I could do this:
>
> <SOAP11:Envelope xmlns:SOAP11="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope";>
>
> Despite my use of the deliberately confusing name (SOAP11), it's
> actually SOAP version 1.2. It's the URI that counts, not the prefix.
>
>
> On 5/3/2011 10:03 AM, ronnie wrote:
>> Hi Charles.
>>
>> I am also a very, very big newbie with HTTPAPI and the SOAP environment myself but I might be able to help.
>>
>> Change your "xmlns:SOAP-ENV="[1]http" to "xmlns:SOAP="[1]http" for version 1.1 or "xmlns:SOAP12="[1]http" for version 1.2 depending on which one you want to use.
>>
>> Also similarly change your soap headers accordingly.
>> + '<SOAP:Header/>'
>> + '<SOAP:Body>'
>> +'</SOAP:Body>'
>> or
>> + '<SOAP12:Header/>'
>> + '<SOAP12:Body>'
>> +'</SOAP12:Body>'
>>
>>
>> Basically change wherever you have "SOAP-ENV" to "SOAP" or "SOAP12"
>>
>> Regards
>> Ronnie
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is the FTPAPI mailing list.  To unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is the FTPAPI mailing list.  To unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the FTPAPI mailing list.  To unsubscribe, please go to:
http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
-----------------------------------------------------------------------