[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re :Re: Facing 500 Internal Error while using HTTPAPI to call a web service
That could be because you are not passing the valid data. I was
getting the same error and I found that in forum side it was
validating the string that I was sending and the data was not valid.
You need to ask the forum team, what exactly you are missing, they
will monitor in their side when you call the webservice.
I hope this will help you. Good Luck.
Rizwan
HTTPAPI and FTPAPI Projects wrote
Hi,
I am using the HTTPAPI to call one of our web
services. The programs errors out with the following
error.
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error.
It seems like a error in the server side. But the same
webervices are being used by other systems easily.
Need help and sugestion about what may be the issue
and where should I start to look up.
Thanks and Regards,
Girija Patro
--- ftpapi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Send Ftpapi mailing list submissions to
> ftpapi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> ftpapi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ftpapi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ftpapi digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: SOCKUTIL vs HTTPAPI question
> (Brian@xxxxxxxxxx)
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:26:53 -0400
> From: Brian@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: SOCKUTIL vs HTTPAPI question
> To: HTTPAPI and FTPAPI Projects
>
> Message-ID:
>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Scott,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Just to be clear, it's not that we added custom
> routines to SOCKUTILR4.
>
> It is that we are using the version from SOCKTUT
> (your Sockets Tutorial)
> and it has additional procedures over the version
> from LIBHTTP.
>
>
> If you choose to keep SOCKUTILR4 in LIBHTTP could
> you make it the same
> version that is in SOCKTUT? This will help with
> the update problem you
> mention.
>
>
> Brian J. Garland
> Vermont Information Processing, Inc.
> brian@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> Scott Klement
> Sent by: ftpapi-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 09/30/2006 02:01 AM
> Please respond to
> HTTPAPI and FTPAPI Projects
>
>
>
> To
> HTTPAPI and FTPAPI Projects
>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: SOCKUTIL vs HTTPAPI question
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> I strongly recommend that you never put any of your
> own code in the same
> library with HTTPAPI. I suggest that because it
> makes it very hard to
> upgrade HTTPAPI. I frequently create new versions
> of HTTPAPI for the sole
>
> reason of fixing bugs, and you wouldn't be able to
> use any of those bug
> fixes! Or new features... or whatever else.
>
> The only stuff that should be in the same library
> with HTTPAPI is the
> stuff that comes with it. That way, you can delete
> that library and
> install the new one, and none of your own code will
> require any changes.
>
> That being the case, there's really no harm in
> having a separate copy of
> SOCKUTILR4 that has your own custom routines.
>
> Having said that, I don't know of any reason why you
> couldn't replace the
> copy of SOCKUTILR4 in HTTPAPI with the one from the
> tutorial. As far as I
>
> know, they're exactly the same (other than the extra
> utilities, of
> course.)
>
> Actually, I was considering eliminating SOCKUTILR4
> from HTTPAPI, putting
> the routines in COMMTCPR4 instead.... but I'm not
> yet sure that I want
> to do that, and I'm a little concerned that it'd
> break someone's code --
> something I don't want to do.
>
> --
> Scott Klement http://www.scottklement.com
>
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Brian@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Scott,
> >
> > We previously downloaded your Socket Utilities and
> used that to put
> > together a communications program.
> >
> > We just downloaded HTTPAPI in order to do some web
> services stuff.
> >
> > The SOCKUTILR4 in LIBHTTP does not have RDLINE &
> WRLINE.
> >
> > Because we use these functions and would like to
> have everything coexist
> > in the same library we have a dilemma.
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there any harm in us using the SOCKUTILR4 (and
> the appropriate /COPY
> > members) from the separate socket download and
> recreating HTTPAPIR4 over
> > that version?
> >
> > In future releases could you bring them in sync
> with each other?
> >
> >
> >
> > Brian J. Garland
> > Vermont Information Processing, Inc.
> > brian@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> This is the FTPAPI mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> please go to:
> http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
>
> Scott,
> Thanks for the reply.
> Just to be clear, it's not that we added custom
> routines to
> SOCKUTILR4.
> It is that we are using the version from SOCKTUT
> (your Sockets
> Tutorial) and it has additional procedures over
> the version from
> LIBHTTP.
> If you choose to keep SOCKUTILR4 in LIBHTTP could
> you make it the same
> version that is in SOCKTUT? This will help with
> the update problem
> you mention.
> Brian J. Garland
> Vermont Information Processing, Inc.
> brian@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Scott Klement
> Sent by: ftpapi-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 09/30/2006 02:01 AM
>
> Please respond to
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This is the FTPAPI mailing list. To unsubscribe, please go to:
http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
[1][1963059423@Middle5?OAS_query=null&PARTNER=3]
References
1. http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigclick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-home.htm/1507191490@Middle5?PARTNER=3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the FTPAPI mailing list. To unsubscribe, please go to:
http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
-----------------------------------------------------------------------