more FTPAPI questions

[Christian <chrisv5@xxxxxx>]

Sender: Christian <chrisv5@xxxxxx>

Here is another question: the handle which is used to identify a session 
to the API is actually the socket descriptor. Internally a simple index 
number is used to *really* identify the session.

Not surprisingly that makes session selection code unnecessary complex. 
Thus I am asking, would it be bad to change that behavior? There won't 
be any changes necessary to the applications using FTPAPI, *unless* 
someone uses the socket descriptor to "mess" with the control connection 
manually. I cannot imagine anyone doing that. Even if so, I'd provide a 
method to retrieve the socket descriptor and some small changes would 
do. Opinions?

Yet another question: how about removing the old session-less APIs? Just 
clutters up the list of APIs IMHO. Objections? Maybe put them into a 
second (optional) SRVPGM for those who still need them?

Regards,
Christian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the FTPAPI mailing list.  To unsubsribe from the list send mail
to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the body: unsubscribe ftpapi mymailaddr
-----------------------------------------------------------------------